A conversation with Mr Richard Mille, President
& CEO, Richard Mille.
By Peter Chong
With exclusive, never published before hand sketches,
showing development of the design of the fascinating watches
PC: Richard, thank you for
meeting me and for being here for this interview. My objective for this
interview is to allow our Timezone readers to have a better understanding of
you as the man behind the brand, and a good look at the central key
propositions of the Richard Mille watches.
Shall we begin with your
involvement in the watch business. You have been in this business for a long
time, although the Richard Mille brand is a fairly new company. Tell us more
about your background.
RM: In fact, I had always been a manager, a frustrated manager
as my mind was always occupied by numbers, finance, figures, marketing, when in
fact I was passionate about technique.
I am totally mad about this subject; watches, cars, aircraft. I am not
personally a watchmaker, and I am pleased to say, Enzo Ferrari was not a car
technician, but he had a very clear idea of what a high-performance car should be.
I believe I have a precise idea of what a high-performance watch should
be. I think I have gone deeper into technique than many others . Nowadays, all
top of the range models for any brand are developed with teams of engineers,
with computers, with cad machines, so I had no hang-ups about starting my own
brand, with a strong concept and very precise technical ideas.
PC: You had an illustrious
career with Mauboussin before you started on your own; tell us more about that
house.
RM: I started with Mauboussin as CEO
of the watch company, in 1993, and finished as Chairman and CEO; as CEO of the
Jewellery Company and CEO of the Holding in 1998. The House of Mauboussin
started in the 19th century, based in Place Vendôme, Paris, and has
always been a very creative Jeweler.
I left the Company for 2 reasons: my project for launching
my own watch was ready, and I did not agree with some members of the family on
their latest strategy , which was to abandon selective distribution and replace
it with a hypothetical �mass market� distribution. This proved to be
unrealistic and megalomaniac. Since then, the new owner has reestablished a
correct distribution policy.
PC: Where did you first start
your fascination on watches, and how you built your businesses?
RM: I do not know whether the fascination for watches was
first or whether it was the love of technique, research and development. I was
about 9 years old when I dismantled my first watch, which of course I couldn�t
put back together again.
But I remember the many times I worked on spare parts that
I later used on my model cars that I had built from scratch and that I still
have today. Since then, I have spent my
time reading technical books relating to watches, cars, aircraft, etc�and this
naturally led me to visualise a strong conceptual watch which was highly
technical but without gimmicks.
This concept was, however, so technically complex that it
led to the very high end positioning where it stands now. This is how my
passion was transformed into reality, and the tremendous success of this brand
is certainly due to the fact that the inspiration was purely technical and not
at any time commercial. This is still
true today.
PC:Tell us more about why you decided to start
Richard Mille.
RM: Without
being megalomaniac, we all dream of leaving something behind us on earth. It
seems that connoisseurs consider this brand as a turning point in watch history, and this certainly was a
motivation. It is always agreeable to
hear so many nice things about a product which is your baby! I also had the
right partners, my old friend Dominique Guenat, and Audemars-Piguet/Renaud
& Papi, money from my
shares in
Mauboussin, so all lights were green!
PC: You exude great drive and
passion, has the Richard Mille the man always been like this? (Richard was
waving his hands in excitement and jumping up and down making his point in the
hotel suite in Geneva when we met�testimony to his passion and �fire and
brimstone� style of expression) Were there difficult times during the birthing
of Richard Mille the brand, and how has this great passion pulled you through?
RM: It�s
very easy to be driven and passionate when your work just happens to be your
passion ! There must have been
times when I questioned myself as to whether I was going the right way, but
honestly, I don�t remember them. I was
always convinced that my direction was the right one and I had and I still have
such faith in my product.
PC: What are the key tenets and special propositions
that the brand will bring to collectors?
RM: I modestly
think, and professionals confirm it, that this brand opens a new era in watch
history, in terms of concept, technique.
PC: I certainly agree with the
professionals too. Shown right is the design development of the chronograph
dial, showing hand sketches by Richard.
RM: It has the 3
basic requirements for auctioneers, i.e: Authenticity, quality, rarity, and I
would add another: creativity, which represents an important aspect in terms of
artistic value.
All important artistic periods, as in painting for
example, represent a complete rupture with existing works. I wanted the Mille
watch to represent a rupture, but at the same time, I wanted to keep the best
of watch-making tradition, such as hand finished angles, work that many top brands do with machines
today.
PC: How do you intend to deliver this (these)
promise(s)?
RM: By simply refusing to go into the mass market and by always
bringing models with Technical added value.
PC: I think
your products look absolutely beautiful and are a breath of fresh air, but the
collecting community has been shown very fickle � favoring new, innovative
brands while the novelty is there, and then going back to the traditional
makers after the �honeymoon is over�. How do you intend to stay relevant for
years to come?
RM: I am aware that many brands disappointed their clients by turning
towards commercial objectives. This is in fact what I have been avoiding
desperately all my life.
The success of my brand is due to the fact that I can pass on my passion
to my client, and my clients can say
that they won�t change this watch for another, although they have plenty others
in their safe. It means that they know my watches are truly genuine, and that
there is no lie in the technical data.
So I am not going to revert to a situation � with purely commercial
objectives � that I�ve always hated, and which I have done everything possible
to step away from. On top of that, I think I have more that enough technical
ideas and concepts for the next 20 years to come and I would be too frustrated
not to transform them into reality! The great painter�s collections became
valuable because of continuous creations. After 2 years of existence, we
already are at model N° 9, model No.10 is in the pipeline and with the arrival
of each new model, more important developments!
PC: Can you tell us more about No.9 and No.10? What about No. 7.
RM: Let me
start first with the RM 008 which will be available shortly.
PC note to audience. The RM008 is a split second
chronograph with tourbillon. Also shown left is the original design of the
unique case, which is elegant and at the same time exudes strength and
engineering feel�much like a Ferrari.
This is certainly the most
complicated watch I have ever made and I would go so far as to say that it will
probably be one of the most complicated the world has ever seen. It�s been five years in development and
taken up thousands of hours of study to arrive at this point. The watch itself will have over 500 separate
pieces.
As for the RM 009, it will be
lightest mechanical watch ever seen, made from ultra-modern materials. Without wanting to give too much away, I
will tell you that its price will be inversely proportional to its weight!
I am very proud of the RM 007
which will be released in May of next year. The 007 is my first watch designed
for ladies and I have done everything I can to avoid the stereotypical female
watch. Often ladies� watches are simply
modified versions of the man�s watch with a few diamonds for good measure. I
realised that women of today are much more demanding; they are now powerful
executives, they choose their own cars and will appreciate a watch with a big
personality.
The RM 010 will have to remain my
secret for the moment but I can assure you that there are lots of developments
in the pipeline.
PC: Please do
let me have the details when you are ready, Timezoners all over the world are
waiting with bated breath for this one! Richard, let me turn now to your
fascination with Formula 1 racing. Why this fascination? How and where does
this relate to watchmaking?
RM: I am in
fact more interested in F1 techniques than in the sport itself. F1 is so rich in terms of development that
it is a great source of inspiration in areas such as performance, rigidity,
resistance, reliability, materials, and functions.
PC: What lessons have you learnt
from F1 techniques that you have applied to your watches? Do you believe a
watch movement has to be absolutely rigid
with respect to its case ? Do you feel a lighter watch is technically
more superior to a heavier one? What about the movement what special features?
RM: From the
outset, my objective was to make a watch using the same thought processes as a
designer of an F1 car. A watch that is
extremely technical but robust enough to withstand all sorts of vibrations and
shocks. I do believe that a movement
must be rigid. I use carbon fibre for the base plate
because I have found that this is the most stable.
PC note
to readers: The RM006 was a world first to implement a carbon fibre movement
plate�what began as an experiment to test the new material, resulted in a
beautiful watch.
Plates made from gold, brass and copper are not
rigid and will react to temperature changes and shock. Carbon fibre, which is
amorphous, will not react in this way and remains rigid, with excellent
isotropic results, as well as chemical stability. For example, this material will not react to thermic shock.
PC: You are personally involved in all aspects
of the design and production of the watches. How do you do this? You are not a
watchmaker, so where do you get the engineering and know how? This page is
scattered with your personal sketches, many of them shown to the public for the
first time. Shown right is the sketch showing the development of the dial, the
numerals, and placement. Even small details are handled personally.
RM: Although I am
not a watchmaker, I have very precise technical ideas and concepts. I am involved every step of the way when we
make the movements, as I design many of them, as well as cases, dials, and all
accessories. I also design the displays and the packaging. I also follow any
aspect of watch production, with my
friend and partner Dominique Guenat.
PC:
Tell us more about Dominique?
RM:
Dominique has been my friend for nearly 20 years and our business relationship
has always been based on a mutual respect, frankness, total confidence in each
other�s morality and of course a love for developments in watchmaking. Dominique took over the family business,
Valgine, in 2001. Valgine has a history
of more than 100 years and has always specialised in private business, working for the the prestigious
houses.
We decided to start a joint
venture in 1999 and created a group of companies specialising in different watch areas; manufacturing small of special cases or other, assembling movements
(tourbillon, automatic....) and assembling the final product. Our objective is to remain with limited
editions that have high technical added values.
PC: Describe
some of these high technical added values.
RM: As I
previously mentioned, my ideas come from a mixture of watch/car/aircraft
techniques. This is why the result is performane, resistant to shocks, has
practical functions, is ergonomic, and has long lasting materials, etc� in
fact, all these technical developments are there for a purpose, and not just as
artistic developments. As I said, I take the best from the tradition, the rest
is open, as long as it has a use and is not a gimmick, because I hate gimmicks!

PC: You have
been known to throw your watch on the floor, or across the table to drive home
the point that your watches are especially tough. Are those watches still
running well? Do you really encourage your customers who buy these beautiful
timepieces to rough-handle their watches?
RM: I just
wanted to prove that this watch is not a piece to be put in a safe, but a real
instrument to be worn. This is why Felipe Massa, Formula one driver for Sauber
Petronas, has been wearing a tourbillon RM006 without any maintenance for 8
Grand Prix. He hasn�t had the slightest problem with it, in spite of intense
vibrations and shocks. In the Canadian Grand Prix, this tourbillon resisted, as
well as the pilot, a deceleration of 113 G, the highest ever recorded by the
FIA. A final note however, I would not encourage owners to throw their watches
on the floor - the case could be
scratched, or the glass broken - but I do insist that these watches really are
for everyday use, like a Formula One you could drive to the office!
PC: You use some
rather interesting materials in your watches. Tell us about some of them, their
special qualities, and special problems you have encountered working with them.
Note to Timezoners: shown left is the design of the crown.
RM: The
basic requirement for perfect material, especially for an important component
such as a movement plate, is rigidity and physical and chemical stability. The
more a material is amorphous and neutral, the better. Titanium or carbon fibers
have got these kind of characteristics. It has taken a long time to validate
these materials. Others have been abandoned. We are now developing other
materials for other purposes but, on the other hand, I do not want to release
materials just because they�re sexy without checking their shelf-life. Any
results must be exactly adapted to the technical requirements. This is what
we�ve done with components in ceramics, ARCAP, Titanium grades 2 and 5, Carbon
fiber.




Sketches of the pincers of the split second hand on
the Rattrapante RM08, and design of the rotor bearing of RM005.
PC: What is your relationship with Renaud et Papi? How has this played
into Audemars Piguet�s very similar Royal Oak Concept watch?
RM: I have
�family� like relationships with Audemars-Piguet and Renaud & Papi. This
relationship is based on friendship, together with mutual intellectual and
technical exchanges, and we develop this everyday. This is quite unusual in the
watch business, where companies are not used to sharing ideas and making joint
developments.
We have some �babies�in common,
and the best is to yet come!
PC note to Timezoners: See design exchange document
shown left showing the collaborative nature of the relationship.
PC: Thank you very much, Richard, and obviously you
have had very good success with RM watches, and I wish you even greater
success.
© Peter Chong October 2004.

.